Reanimacija arhivskih filmova. Sublimnost sepijastog propadanja. Svjetovi se rastapaju u magmi istovremenog spajanja i nestajanja. Lirika filmskog celuloida.
Čudesna remekdjela. Decasia je po nekima, najbolji film svih vremena.
Light Is Calling (2004):
Film by Bill Morrison (director, producer, editor)
Music by Michael Gordon (composer, ASCAP)
A scene from a deteriorating print of James Youngs The Bells (1926) was optically printed and re-edited to Michael Gordons 7 minute composition. A meditation on the nature of random collisions.
"In Light Is Calling, a deteriorating scene from James Young's The Bells (1926) was optically reprinted and edited to Michael Gordon's seven-minute composition. The aesthetic of Morrison's film is inexorably intertwined with many of Michael Gordon's pieces. We watch a decomposing film reel of a soldier who meets a mysterious woman in the woods. A meditation on the random and fleeting nature of life and love, as seen through the roiling emulsion of an ancient film. Morrison's short was made through the process of reshooting decomposing black and white film, and the result is a dreamy, melting, light-drenched scene." —The Viennale
"Light is Calling [is one of Morrison's] more accessible works, an incomparably beautiful and sad film experiment. ...A militiaman riding; a woman waiting; a meeting; a departure. Simple though it is, this story is enough to give Morrison's work a backbone. As images emerge through the painterly swirls of emulsion, the viewer is invited-nay, required-to reflect on the ephemeral quality of the film and, by extension, its characters. For those with limited patience for non-narrative "artsy" films, "Light is Calling" is just the right length. Only in the final thirty seconds or so does Gordon's haunting avant-garde score cross the line into dissonance, breaking the delicate connection it held with Morrison's images. Still, this breathtaking film manages to capture your emotions as well as your eyes."—Christopher Zinsli, Film Threat
"Ecstatic! In which bodies and movements dissolve in swirling waves of golden light, the film's decay radiating as a glorious self-immolation."—Maximilian Le Cain, Senses of Cinema
"Heart-stoppingly beautiful."—Zoetica Ebb, Coilhouse Magazine
"Bill Morrison worked directly with the film stock of The Bells (1926) to create Light Is Calling (2003). The film is stripped to an elemental scene: a woman’s face, a man arriving in a coach. They are awash in the roils of optically printed and manipulated film, their surroundings billowing around them as if brushed on. To be sure, the effect lends itself to nostalgia in its acknowledgment of the medium’s physical deterioration. And yet this scene conjures more than loss. It is both the instant of a woman and man coming together, and their breaking apart, the simultaneous hope and loss of love." -
"Morrison’s other film from THE BELLS is called LIGHT IS CALLING, and it’s even lovelier and more tragic.
I was wondering what these images reminded me of — experimental films send my thoughts flitting about, whereas narrative works tether my brain to the unfolding events — and I thought of Max Ernst’s painting Europe After the Rain, a sort of apocalyptic vista of psychedelic distortion, created by a technique Ernst called decalcomania: you’ve probably used the approach at nursery school without hearing the big word. Simply paint one sheet of paper thickly with different hues, press another on top of it, then peel them apart, to create beautiful abstract patterns.
And of course, that’s how Morrison’s work is created too. As the nitrate stock deteriorates, the surface turns to jam, and the whole reel gets gummed up. As the film is unspooled, the celluloid strips aways from itself, exactly like those sheets of paper when you were four, and with similar results. THE BELLS peeled.
The way the sepia tinting oozes like marmalade and assumes myriad hues made me think of a print by Turner of ships at sea that hung framed in our house when I was a kid, a golden mist through which shapes loomed in abstracted outline. Equally, I was reminded of Andres Serrano’s ludicrously controversial work, Piss Christ, in which an image of the Crucifixion glows dimly through obscuring golden clouds of urine.
I also thought of Ralph Steadman’s Paranoids, Polaroid images mutilated with a blunt instrument as the image is still developing, squashing and stretching facial features to turn likenesses into unlikenesses, actualité caricatures. I was never able to get that to work, although I did have my Polaroid taken by a ghost once. Beat that, Steadman. - dcairns
Decasia (2002):
Music/electronic feedback/drones/audio decay: Sean Corvan (2012):
"This radical, experimental masterwork feels like the first film, and feels like the last film." - Andrew Lewis Conn, Time Out New York
"A hallucinatory canvas of images... succeeds as a pure exercise in visual stimulus, its narcotic effect much amplified by Michael Gordon's thunderous, dissonant orchestral score." - Dennis Harvey, Variety
"Unbearably beautiful. It's a work of suggestive genius." - Ed Gonzalez, Slant Magazine
"Bill Morrison's extraordinarily mesmerizing 'Decasia' is a stunningly beautiful... ode to creation and decay." - Shari Frilot, Sundance Film Festival
"A work of nihilistic energy and harsh, uncompromising beauty, capable of sustaining multiple readings and interpretations. It is, in short, a work of real art. There are precedents for this sort of thing but nothing remotely of this scale, much less power. The final coup is a genuinely transformative and unforgettable experience." - Shane Danielsen, 56th Edinburgh International Film Festival
"Compelling and disturbing! Swimming symphonies of baroque beauty emerge from corrosive nitrate disintegration as rockets of annihilation demolish cathedrals of reality." - Kenneth Anger, filmmaker
"A pure poetry of deliquescence. The images are at once haunting, mysterious and incredibly beautiful. A definitive work of art. And a new kind of documentary. A documentary documenting the decay of itself." - Errol Morris, filmmaker
"Bill Morrison's Decasia is that rare thing: a movie with avant-garde and universal appeal, occasioning two separate features so far in The New York Times. Morrison is not the first artist to take decomposing film stock as his raw material, but he plunges into this dark nitrate of the soul with contagious abandon. Few movies are so much fun to describe. Heralded by a spinning dervish, Decasia's first movement seems culled from century-old actualités: Kimono-clad women emerge from a veil of spotty mold, a caravan of camels is silhouetted against the warped desert horizon, a Greek dancer disintegrates into a blotch barrage, the cars for an ancient Luna Park ride repeatedly materialize out of seething chaos.
Decasia is founded on the tension between the hard fact of film's stained, eroded, unstable surface and the fragile nature of that which was once photographically represented. Michael Snow contrived something similar in the chemical conflagration of his 1991 To Lavoisier, Who Died in the Reign of Terror—in which he purposefully distressed new footage. But Morrison is far more expressionistic. A second opposition arises between the lushly deteriorated images and composer Michael Gordon's no less textured, increasingly ominous drone. (Unlike Philip Glass's scores, Gordon's never overpowers the visual accompaniment—even when it escalates to wall of sound.) A third opposition might be termed ideological. - J. Hoberman
"Film was an invention before it was an art and is futurist by nature, always on the lookout for its next evolutionary leap. Films made just a few years ago are technically laughable now, and although Hollywood pays annual lip service to the past with a lifetime achievement Oscar for some old sucker, the vogue for remakes betrays its fundamental contempt for history.
Until Martin Scorsese and Woody Allen intervened, it even looked as if classics such as Casablanca were going to be "colourised" so audiences would never have to experience the seedy smell of age. Cinema tends to see its own past as about as attractive as that sticky patch on the floor in the fourth row.
In this world of the perpetually vanishing present, in which only the thing not yet unwrapped can truly be trusted as new, Bill Morrison's Decasia sticks out like a leper's thumb. This film doesn't so much savour the past as make perverted love to the silver, shimmering dead.
Morrison has made a 70-minute feature composed entirely of early nitrate footage. Cellulose nitrate base was abandoned by film-makers around 1950, a technical improvement that really was justified. Nitrate film is highly flammable and prone to rot. Yet it is the rot that fascinates Morrison. Decasia is the Fantasia of decay.
Morrison has found examples of old film, from archives such as George Eastman House and the Museum of Modern Art, going back to the beginning of the 20th century: some drama, some documentary, screen tests, all kinds of peculiar images that have decayed in intriguing ways.
Edited with an authentically poetic sensibility and delirious timing, the images flow mysteriously into one another in what feels like a necessary, meaningful structure, though inexplicable. Faces and buildings dance in and out of random, abstract pools of black, grey and silver; faces become chrome shadows; the sun turns black; flames look like water.
The effect of the nitrate film's decay is to make everything seem fluid, while creating a weird landscape of grotesque, pulsing shapes. It's all scarily counterpointed by Michael Gordon's soundtrack: feedback music, rising at the most intense moments to a screech. In fact the music begat the film. Decasia was commissioned for a multimedia performance of Gordon's symphony of the same name.
Among the raves that have pursued Decasia since its showing at Sundance and New York's Anthology Film Archives is a "Compelling and disturbing!" from Kenneth Anger, the great American film-maker. To disturb Kenneth Anger - follower of Aleister Crowley, better known for hexing people than praising them, whose own films are occult rituals of sex and death - has to be considered quite an achievement.
In fact, if Decasia has any antecedent, it is in the ominously erotic and gorgeously nightmarish rites of Anger's cinema. It reminded me of Eaux d'Artifice, his 1953 reverie among ghostly fountains in the Renaissance gardens of Tivoli; other analogies might be the sickly-hued photography of old San Francisco in Hitchcock's Vertigo, or the chilling Victorian photographs in Wisconsin Death Trip.
Decasia is on a death trip of its own. In fine art and architecture, ruin has been regarded as picturesque since the 18th century, but cinema's ruins are rarely visited. Rancid and, in normal terms, unwatchable, these bits of film are gradually fading into nothing in archives away from the light and away from the cinema. They were never meant to flicker into life again.
The experience of Decasia is abstract and figurative. Leonardo da Vinci recommended staring at marks on walls to find ideas for paintings, and there's something endlessly pleasurable and hypnotic about the wet blotches, expanding and contracting shadows, the thickly textured accretions, formations like porous rock or cork, the rivers, volcanos and scars that breed on the surface of the images monochromatically staring at you from Morrison's footage.
Like landscapes made by the surrealist method of Decalcomania, in which paint is pressed between two surfaces resulting in arbitrary rocky formations, the blemishes, seepage and intrusions that all but blot out barely glimpsed moving pictures give Decasia the unfathomable mystery of an abstract painting made by something inhuman. The artist here is not Morrison: he is a medium, allowing the random creativity of decay, of time itself, to become visible.
This would not be such an original, engaging film, however, were it simply an exercise in abstract cinema or avant-garde playfulness. What makes Decasia so beguiling is that the film footage Morrison has discovered is only partly destroyed. You can see images, and not just any images. The dead and forgotten faces seen through the fog are moving, striking, sometimes frightening. Beginning with a trancelike sequence of a whirling dervish, we see burning shacks, landscapes with the sun turned black, parachutists in a fizzling soup of sky, a young couple coming towards us and fading before our eyes, sentenced to make this walk again and again on an Edwardian street in Edwardian clothes, their faces grey velvet holes. In another sequence, a man in perhaps the 1920s is flirting with two women, one of whom is merely a burnt shadow.
Sometimes the effects are so expressive you can't believe chance did this. But it did. Morrison's editing is so emotional that he makes you see, always, something behind what is on screen, shadowy back stories. Gradually the power of it mounts and from mild pleasure in seeing something so unusual you become involved, tense, menaced.
Bill Morrison has created a unique artefact, as enigmatically authoritative as Max Ernst's collage novel Une Semaine de Bonté. It has a sculpted, sensual quality, a richness of texture missing from most modern cinema: in place of all those clean, digital, precise empty blockbusters here's something dense, deep, full of unnameable spectral presences. It is film as landscape, as sublime vista, and at the same time as history, as fact. It makes you think of Joseph Cornell's memory boxes, Robert Rauschenberg's time-stuffed assemblages, Anger, Hitchcock. It makes you feel that the art, as opposed to the business, of cinema does have a future - even if it has to be found deep in the past" - Jonathan Jones
"Bill Morrison’s film Decasia: The State of Decay is art. I don’t mean to say that Hitchcock’s Vertigo or any number of Dogma films are any less art. But Decasia is art the way Blood of a Poet is or Stan Brakhage’s Mothlight or Bruce Conner’s Movie or Andy Warhol’s Empire are.
Decasia was originally created for a multimedia event, featuring the music of Bang-on-a-Can founder Michael Gordon at the Bridge Theater, then performed as a music-with-film piece for the Basel Sinfonietta.Although Gordon’s music is fine by itself (and is also about decay), the original cart is leading the horse, for the film has a life of its own outsideits multimedia roots.
The sequences seem to be cut to the music, which now forms the soundtrack. But there was probably a good deal of back-and-forth between the filmmaker and composer.The music might be able to stand on its own, but I tried watching the DVD without the soundtrack. It’s not quite the same, so I suspect that sound and image are integral.
Briefly, the viewer is led from a whirling dervish through various sequences of beauteous decay: nuns and children in cloisters, rescues, parts of a 1912 Pearl White film, an invasion. Then an hour or so later we are back to the dervish. In the interim there are gorgeous blooms, blobs, and even black-and-white inversions looking strangely like solarization. A boxer battles a “living” punching bag, ghosts dance, and ectoplasm seems to invade a heated drawing-room scene.
But the moving, amoebic, moldy blobs and blisters are the best. It is as if the flesh of vision is being devoured, all to the music of brake drums and eerie, out-of-tune pianos. And as a friend of mine volunteered, Decasia is a kind of time machine. Developing this idea, it is not so much that nitrate film stock is unstable, but that memory is.
Decasia fits into the category of a now largely ignored tradition: that of films meant to hold their own with painting and sculpture. Not, of course, as paintings and sculptures per se, but as films made outside the mass-media market and usually outside the narrative tradition, and within the modernist and postmodernist visual-art playing field.
Often, as modernists would have it, these so-called experimental movies are films-about-film — as, in part, Decasia is. But that is only half the story. The other half is that they evince personal expression of a kind that Hollywood (or Bollywood, for that matter) can rarely afford, because of the group structure of the enterprise and the audience target. The New American Independent Cinema (too much of a mouthful to function as an effective tag, if you ask me), sometimes called Underground Cinema (better, but sounds more subversive than warranted), in full flame from the ’40s through the ’60s, was probably one of those glory moments that cannot be duplicated.
This is not to say that “underground films” (more likely these days to be digital-format video) are no longer made. As long as verbal language exists, somewhere a poet will be making a poem. So too, as long as there’s an affordable way to capture and string together moving images, there will be an artist-filmmaker, videoist, or digitalist playing with, or even against, images in time. It’s just that the discussion about avant-garde film like all discourse, had a half-life and has itself decayed.
The repressed topic, the subject that should be addressed, is this loss. Decasia is so good a film it should renew that discourse. This is the real importance of Decasia and not the journalistic emphasis on, say, the tragedy of disintegrating nitrate and the need to save so many films in so little time.
Painters and sculptors and even art critics used to attend screenings of new avant-garde, experimental films and argue about them. Independent art films were part of the art culture, as was music (John Cage speaking at The Club,John Coltrane playing at the Five Spot and the Cedar Bar) as was dance (Merce Cunningham). Many artists, I would guess, fantasized about making films. Some, like Red Grooms, made amusing films and some, like Alfred Leslie, made important ones (Pull My Daisy) that encapsulate the feel of an artistic milieu.
Now, when painters want to make movies, they want to make Hollywood films. This is okay if you are Julian Schnabel and actually have some mass-media talent, but otherwise, leaving aside the beautiful and moving wall projections of Shirin Neshat and the iffy epics of Matthew Barney, we can only mourn that film as art has been subsumed by film as entertainment .
Decasia, coming through the front door, as it were, of the popular press, may be the sign of change. A laudatory article by Lawrence Weschler (author of books on artist Robert Irwin and the playful Museum of Jurassic Technology in L.A.) in the New York Times Sunday Magazine in December 2002 was not really the kiss of death it could have been. Remember that Jackson Pollock’s first big splash was in Vogue.
Decasia is imbedded in the film-as-art tradition; if you are conversant with that world you cannot look at it without thinking of Stan Brakhage’s various scratched and painted films and, for the use of found footage, Joseph Cornell’s sublime Rose Hobart. Yet,as it should be, Morrison’s masterpiece is curiously new." -
Symphony of Compositions From Decomposition
‘Decasia,’ Celebration of Decay, From Icarus Films
THE cinema may or may not be dead, but film almost certainly is. Celluloid-based entertainment will become either a dim memory or a boutique specialty within the next few years, as the major studios continue to phase out bulky, old-fashioned (but oh so beautiful) 35-millimeter prints in favor of Digital Cinema Packages (DCPs, for short) delivered to theaters on hard drives or through high-speed Internet connections.Icarus Films
University of South Carolina Moving Image Research Collections/Icarus Films
Library of Congress/Icarus Films
Which is why it is both creepy and poetically just that Bill Morrison’s “Decasia,”
a work precisely centered on the unexpected glories of decaying film
stock, has now been released on the living-room equivalent of the DCP,
the Blu-ray disc. Distributed by the independent company Icarus Films,
“Decasia” has now escaped the fragile world of celluloid for the eerily
immaterial realm of the digital, where the scratches, dust mites and
flaking emulsion that give film prints their character and physicality
are a thing of the 20th-century past.
Academics have recently come to identify those unintended physical
aspects of film technology as the “haptic” element of the cinema — those
seemingly tactile qualities, like the cue marks that once appeared in
the upper-right-hand corner of the frame to warn projectionists that the
end of a reel was approaching, and the time for changing over to the
second projector was nigh. (When they were missing, projectionists used
to make their own cue marks by burning them into prints with lighted
cigarettes, not a great idea given the explosive potential of
nitrate-based celluloid in use for much of the first 50 years of
cinema.)
In today’s digital cinema, cue marks are a thing of the past, as are the
dangerously unstable nitrate prints, which were eliminated in the early
1950s in favor of acetate stock, which was less inclined to burst into
flame or, over time, decompose into a gelatinous mass and eventually
collapse into powder.
“Decasia” seizes on those transitional moments, when the readable images
of nitrate film are slipping into the many odd and curious distortions
caused by the decay of the physical medium. Some images seem to flake
away; some blossom into glowing effects that suggest the solarization
that was a popular technique for evoking the psychedelic experience of
the ’60s; others suffer distortions like those of a fun-house mirror;
still others seem to be invaded by swelling masses of bacteria, like
something you would observe in a petri dish.
Mr. Morrison’s film is founded on an enduring paradox: that decay
produces its own kind of beauty, and even functions as a kind of
creation. Originally assembled as a component of Ridge Theater’s
“multimedia theatricalization” of a symphony by Michael Gordon, first
performed in Switzerland in 2001, “Decasia” has gone on to become that
rarest of birds, an experimental film with crossover appeal.
On one level the film is a kind of Rorschach test in which the decaying
images become animated inkblots, open to whatever identifications the
spectator chooses to impose on them, from garden gnomes to genitals. On
another, the film provides a kind of “2001” psychedelia, a rush of
abstract images linked to the trance-inducing drone of Mr. Gordon’s
score. As the base reality of the images buckles and bubbles away, at
least some members of the audience will experience some mild 1960s
flashbacks.
But “Decasia” is by no means a randomly assembled collection of footage.
Mr. Morrison has clearly logged a lot of hours at film archives —
including the Museum of Modern Art, the Library of Congress and George
Eastman House — in pursuit of particularly evocative instances of decay.
Some shots seem almost too good to be true, as when an
early-20th-century boxer spars with the shifting mass of nitrate rot
that has erased his punching bag, or when explorers discover what looks
like a blobby space alien pulsing in the depths of a cave. An airplane,
crossing what once had been a clear blue sky, finds itself in a mighty
contest with the elements as great, dark thunderclouds of rot rise
around it, suddenly illuminated by bolts of lightning, or perhaps
artillery shells fired by an unseen enemy.
Conceived as a homage to Disney’s “Fantasia,”
“Decasia” also moves through a series of distinct movements. In the
chapter headings of the disc they are identified as “creation” (the sea,
emerging land masses, swirling speckles that might be spermatozoa);
“civilization” (buildings sway and collapse, schoolchildren struggle to
stay in orderly lines, narrative fragments emerge, along with fleeting
close-ups of early movie stars like William S. Hart and Mary Pickford);
“conundrum” (images so deteriorated that they are only fitfully
readable); and finally “disintegration and rebirth,” in which images,
largely of the natural world, seem to form themselves out of the dark
chaos of decay.
Unifying the various sections are repeated newsreel images of film being
processed in an industrial laboratory — the moment of birth for a
movie, as it emerged from the amniotic fluid of the developing tank — as
well an emphasis on circular images, like a Sufi whirling dervish, or
an Indian homespun weaver at work at his wheel. No simple nostalgist,
Mr. Morrison comes to emphasize the cyclical nature of creation. The new
devours the old, which will be devoured in its turn.
Digital technology does not mean an end to this cycle. It may even mean
an acceleration of it. The zeros and ones of digital recording may exist
outside the physical world, but the media used to disseminate those
binary streams is still very much limited by material reality. The
magnetic surfaces and optical discs used to fix digital information are
just as vulnerable, if not more so, than celluloid. (The glue that holds
iron oxide to tape flakes away, the light-sensitive dye that makes
DVD-R recordings possible eventually fades into nothingness.) In these
cases the resulting decay has little poetry about it; the sounds and
images are either there or not there. At the moment there are few if any
major archives that regard digital media as a reliable standard for
preservation, while, properly cared for, the new acetate film stock will
endure for hundreds of years. - DAVE KEHR
Ghost world
Jonathan Jones pays tribute to a stirring, haunting modern masterpiece put together from decaying old film footage
Film was an invention before it was an art and is futurist by nature, always on the lookout for its next evolutionary leap. Films made just a few years ago are technically laughable now, and although Hollywood pays annual lip service to the past with a lifetime achievement Oscar for some old sucker, the vogue for remakes betrays its fundamental contempt for history.
Until Martin Scorsese and Woody Allen intervened, it even looked as if classics such as Casablanca were going to be "colourised" so audiences would never have to experience the seedy smell of age. Cinema tends to see its own past as about as attractive as that sticky patch on the floor in the fourth row.
In this world of the perpetually vanishing present, in which only the thing not yet unwrapped can truly be trusted as new, Bill Morrison's Decasia sticks out like a leper's thumb. This film doesn't so much savour the past as make perverted love to the silver, shimmering dead.
Morrison has made a 70-minute feature composed entirely of early nitrate footage. Cellulose nitrate base was abandoned by film-makers around 1950, a technical improvement that really was justified. Nitrate film is highly flammable and prone to rot. Yet it is the rot that fascinates Morrison. Decasia is the Fantasia of decay.
Morrison has found examples of old film, from archives such as George Eastman House and the Museum of Modern Art, going back to the beginning of the 20th century: some drama, some documentary, screen tests, all kinds of peculiar images that have decayed in intriguing ways.
Edited with an authentically poetic sensibility and delirious timing, the images flow mysteriously into one another in what feels like a necessary, meaningful structure, though inexplicable. Faces and buildings dance in and out of random, abstract pools of black, grey and silver; faces become chrome shadows; the sun turns black; flames look like water.
The effect of the nitrate film's decay is to make everything seem fluid, while creating a weird landscape of grotesque, pulsing shapes. It's all scarily counterpointed by Michael Gordon's soundtrack: feedback music, rising at the most intense moments to a screech. In fact the music begat the film. Decasia was commissioned for a multimedia performance of Gordon's symphony of the same name.
Among the raves that have pursued Decasia since its showing at Sundance and New York's Anthology Film Archives is a "Compelling and disturbing!" from Kenneth Anger, the great American film-maker. To disturb Kenneth Anger - follower of Aleister Crowley, better known for hexing people than praising them, whose own films are occult rituals of sex and death - has to be considered quite an achievement.
In fact, if Decasia has any antecedent, it is in the ominously erotic and gorgeously nightmarish rites of Anger's cinema. It reminded me of Eaux d'Artifice, his 1953 reverie among ghostly fountains in the Renaissance gardens of Tivoli; other analogies might be the sickly-hued photography of old San Francisco in Hitchcock's Vertigo, or the chilling Victorian photographs in Wisconsin Death Trip.
Decasia is on a death trip of its own. In fine art and architecture, ruin has been regarded as picturesque since the 18th century, but cinema's ruins are rarely visited. Rancid and, in normal terms, unwatchable, these bits of film are gradually fading into nothing in archives away from the light and away from the cinema. They were never meant to flicker into life again.
The experience of Decasia is abstract and figurative. Leonardo da Vinci recommended staring at marks on walls to find ideas for paintings, and there's something endlessly pleasurable and hypnotic about the wet blotches, expanding and contracting shadows, the thickly textured accretions, formations like porous rock or cork, the rivers, volcanos and scars that breed on the surface of the images monochromatically staring at you from Morrison's footage.
Like landscapes made by the surrealist method of Decalcomania, in which paint is pressed between two surfaces resulting in arbitrary rocky formations, the blemishes, seepage and intrusions that all but blot out barely glimpsed moving pictures give Decasia the unfathomable mystery of an abstract painting made by something inhuman. The artist here is not Morrison: he is a medium, allowing the random creativity of decay, of time itself, to become visible.
This would not be such an original, engaging film, however, were it simply an exercise in abstract cinema or avant-garde playfulness. What makes Decasia so beguiling is that the film footage Morrison has discovered is only partly destroyed. You can see images, and not just any images. The dead and forgotten faces seen through the fog are moving, striking, sometimes frightening. Beginning with a trancelike sequence of a whirling dervish, we see burning shacks, landscapes with the sun turned black, parachutists in a fizzling soup of sky, a young couple coming towards us and fading before our eyes, sentenced to make this walk again and again on an Edwardian street in Edwardian clothes, their faces grey velvet holes. In another sequence, a man in perhaps the 1920s is flirting with two women, one of whom is merely a burnt shadow.
Sometimes the effects are so expressive you can't believe chance did this. But it did. Morrison's editing is so emotional that he makes you see, always, something behind what is on screen, shadowy back stories. Gradually the power of it mounts and from mild pleasure in seeing something so unusual you become involved, tense, menaced.
Bill Morrison has created a unique artefact, as enigmatically authoritative as Max Ernst's collage novel Une Semaine de Bonté. It has a sculpted, sensual quality, a richness of texture missing from most modern cinema: in place of all those clean, digital, precise empty blockbusters here's something dense, deep, full of unnameable spectral presences. It is film as landscape, as sublime vista, and at the same time as history, as fact. It makes you think of Joseph Cornell's memory boxes, Robert Rauschenberg's time-stuffed assemblages, Anger, Hitchcock. It makes you feel that the art, as opposed to the business, of cinema does have a future - even if it has to be found deep in the past. - Jonathan Jones
Spark of Being (2010):
"Spark of Being" wins LA Film Critics Award for Best Independent/Experimental film
"Working with the composer and trumpeter Dave Douglas, Bill Morrison ("Decasia") takes on Mary Shelley's classic "Frankenstein", and pieces together a new tale of re-animation. Using archival documentary film footage edited to re-tell Shelley's tale of an appropriated life, set to an original score performed by Dave Douglas and Keystone. Original compositions by Dave Douglas"
Vimeo ulomak
"An inspired collaboration between one of the most adventurous American filmmakers and one of the most exploratory American jazz musicians, found-footage production "Spark of Being...draws fascinating parallels between the invention of cinema and that of the Creature, and pulls Shelley's 19th-century tale into the modern age." - Robert Koehler
"The next day, Alice goes to see Bill Morrison’s Spark of Being, the most experimental film of the AFI Fest (that went on to win the Los Angeles Film Critics Association). Based in New York, Morrison has designed original ways to pursue his passion: working with archival footage, especially “damaged” ones, and to play with the exquisite textures of shapes and colours created by the disintegration of nitrate or celluloid filmstrip. Not unlike the painting and scratching of film of a Brakhage, these alterations create a second narrative hidden in the original mimesis, or totally subvert the cinematic space, turning it into a sort of abstract-expressionist canvas. One way or another, Morrison’s work puts cinematic representation into abyme, forcing the spectators to confront the demons or the unexpected beauty emerging from the most cliched narrative tropes. This is time-consuming, meticulous work, involving months of research, clearance of rights and careful editing. To support his endeavour, Morrison usually partners with musicians, who commission “visuals” to accompany a score, or work with theatre artists in multimedia pieces involving music, screened images and live performance. This insures his independence from the modes of financing prevailing in experimental film circles: certain (limited) grants, teaching jobs… Displaying a flair for the best of contemporary music (his collaborators include Bill Frisell, Michael Gordon, Vijay Iyer, Jóhan Jóhannsson and Todd Reynolds), Morrison has to insure the resilience of his “decaying” images against a wall-to-wall accompaniment. He also manages to insert gaps, breathing moments in the music, often with extreme wit. In Spark of Being, for example, the end of a German country dance unfolds in complete silence. And sometimes, Dave Douglas’s inspired jazz composition (performed by his six-man band, Keystone), when combined with visuals that are even more formidable, sounds like a haunted silence.
Spark of Being is an original re-telling – or an exhilarating deconstruction – of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. The Monster is nowhere to be seen (except, maybe, as a lone caped figure in the last, mysterious image), but the film explores the theme of the monstrous, as it starts with an enigmatic shot of a crowd of long-dead men wearing fedoras and gaping at a spectacle off-screen. It then segues into footage from the 1914 Shackleton South Pole expedition, the events being “told” in two different “chapters” (separated by intertitles, as in early cinema) from the point of view of “The Captain” then of “The Traveller”. Images of a ship and icebergs, ship sailing among floating ice, ship stuck on ice field, men driving dog-drawn sleds, the crew’s survival efforts on the vast expanse of snow or on the stranded ship, return in the last ten minutes of the film, bookending it (as in Shelley’s original story). The second time, though, instead of functioning as a narrative device to introduce the Creature, they represent the odd spectacle offered to his eyes. From an object of fear (and desire), the Creature becomes a subject of the gaze, in a setting that underscores the outlandish conditions under which early cinematographers (Frank Hurley in this case) worked, and the harsh determination (madness to some) they displayed to bring these images back. Cinema itself may be the monster, as it begets images are not always in the realm of the visible, but of the imagination. What early cinema was pointing out, in the off-screen, was the heroic conditions of its production. This is an apt metaphor for the revamping of the myth of Frankenstein performed by Morrison and Douglas: it’s not easy to make a man, it’s not easy to make a film. In both cases we have a composite creature “stitched” from disparate parts, some recognisable, some not. Morrison combines barely legible shots (decayed footage) with images partially obscured by various states of decomposition or by an absence of context. The familiar – family pictures, pageantry, educational films – is made uncanny, as in this lovely sequence excerpted from a 1970s soft porn film, in which lovemaking in the wood between two attractive models is artificially degraded, suggesting the innocence of early erotic cinema (did Alice dream, or did she catch a floating moment from Hedy Lamarr’s nude scene in Gustav Machaty’s 1933 Ecstasy?), the lost paradise of an unattainable “normality”.
Earlier, Alice had received an email that an additional screening of Béla Tarr’s A torinói ló (The Turin Horse) was added that same evening in Grauman’s Chinese. She had already seen the film, yet in another shopping mall, a gigantic 12-story affair hosting some of the screenings of the Hong Kong Film Festival. Having made a date to speak with Tarr, she invites Morrison to join her. “I have always missed The Turin Horse,” says Morrison, so they decide to watch the last hour of the film on the spectacular screen. As the Sixth Day starts, father and daughter gradually prepare to die, and they come to say goodbye to the horse. There is no water, and soon no fire and no light. Darkness engulfs their poor dwelling. In the last minute of the film, sitting at the table across each other, they try to eat raw potatoes. You hear the sound made by the man’s teeth on the unappetising texture. You cringe for him. He can’t go on. It is the end. As Stéphane Breton writes, “Tarr describes a world that comes after totalitarianism, after the fall, after the knowledge of pain. For those who have seen communism extend to infinity, this world has a real, sinister existence.” -
Lost Avenues (1991):
The Miner's Hymns:
Just Ancient Loops - excerpt Vimeo
Excerpt from Michael Harrison's "Just Ancient Loops", performed by Maya Beiser, with film by Bill Morrison.
Koller and Freud Vimeo
Short film about my great grandfather Carl Koller, and his relationship to Sigmund Freud and cocaine while they were interns at the General Hospital in Vienna in 1884.
A Trip to the Beach Vimeo
Camera by Gene, Edit by Bill Morrison, Music by William Basinski
The Great Flood
Ghost Trip Vimeo
"He rose up from the Dead". The Driver of a Cadillac hearse journeys from one end of the film to the other, picking up and finally delivering a wayward soul.
Combining verité filmmaking with a highly stylized visual design, "Ghost Trip" weaves an hallucinatory re-imagining of the American road as a state of Limbo.
Jurors' Choice (top award) - Black Maria Film & Video Festival, 2001 ________________________________________________________________________
Written, directed, produced, photographed and edited by Bill Morrison
Soundscape by Michael Montes
Tributes - Pulse (2011):
'Tributes-Pulse' (65 min, HDCam, Dolby E, color, 2011) is a collaboration between American filmmaker Bill Morrison and Danish composer and percussionist Simon Christensen. Christensen originally conceived of the project as a tribute to four American composers: Charles Ives (1874-1954), Conlon Nancarrow (1912-1997), Steve Reich (b. 1936), and Trent Reznor (b. 1965). Using exquisitely deteriorating nitrate-based archival film, and an original aerial shot, Morrison weaves a story from the remnants of disparate narratives of the 20th century.
"Though he’d been making films since the early nineties, Bill Morrison never really made an impact until the arrival of his feature debut Decasia in 2002. A paean to celluloid, this remarkable work combined Michael Gordon’s wall-of-sound score with excessively damaged nitrate film stock. The result was, quite literally, cinema in its death throes. Morrison’s next feature, The Miners' Hymns, came in 2010 and continued this theme of cultural death. Cinema was replaced by the British mining industry, but the method remained the same: subtly manipulated found footage plus expressive soundtrack, this time from Swedish multi-instrumentalist Jóhann Jóhannsson. Decasia was at once astonishingly beautiful and a striking call to arms for film preservation; The Miners' Hymns was altogether more concentrated: a representation of a workforce that was at once historical, sociological and personal. (Admittedly the political dimensions were undercut by having New Yorker make a film very specifically about the North East of England.) For his latest full-length work, Tributes - Pulse, Morrison takes on the 20th century and finds himself back in Decasia territory: damaged film stock and a wide-ranging subject alongside the all-important score. Here it’s a collaboration with the Danish composer Simon Christensen, albeit with an entirely American influence. As the first part of the title makes clear, tributes are the order of the day, to Charles Ives, to Conlon Nancarrow, to Steve Reich and to Trent Reznor.
Such a quartet - each drawn to the extremities of musical composition - should immediately alert the viewer that Tributes - Pulse is not an easy listening experience. The lushness of Gordon’s Decasia score and the intense swells of Jóhannsson’s combination of brass and electronica for The Miners' Hymns give way to harsher, more abrasive textures. Christensen gives the impression that he is scoring the damage to the film stock rather than the images beneath, thereby creating a soundtrack that is all about interruption and interference, disruption and disturbance. A percussionist as well as composer, he creates intense electronic rhythms accompanied by an often barely perceptible acoustic element. Constructed as four separate movements, Tributes - Pulse’s score understandably contains its quieter moments and passages, yet this intensity wins through. Indeed, some may find the film’s opening ten minutes a genuine test as we are thrown straight into an aural onslaught without any forewarning. The comforting tones of the earlier features - and the gentle accessibility they once provided - are long gone; Christensen appears to be heralding a more hardcore Morrison, stripped of the pleasant and more agreeable sides of his usual style.
Tributes - Pulse begins, without credits, on a screen occupied almost entirely with immense degradation. Only the very edges of the frame reveal any ‘image’, as it were, though the visible area is such that it’s impossible to discern any detail or maintain any ideas as to what it could be. By way of contrast both Decasia and The Miners' Hymns opened with blemish-free footage, newly filmed in the case of the latter. There was an immediate connection to be made in these instances, yet Morrison denies such a possibility here. Indeed, initial thoughts turn to just how much Morrison will be denying throughout Tributes - Pulse. Will narrative considerations go out of the window too, accompanying this sense of recognition and the grandiose scores of previous films? The early evidence would appear to point in that direction: Christensen’s compositions seemingly matching the damage as opposed to the images beneath; and Morrison’s desire to focus on this damage during these initial stages, both through his editing choices and his manipulation of the footage - loops, changes in speed, and so on.
Understandably this lack of immediate connection through standard means prompts questions as to why Morrison and Christensen are putting this emphasis on the deterioration. Its use is pointedly different from that Decasia and arguably far more aggressive. Though still in possession of a certain strange beauty, the lysergic qualities found in the earlier work feel somewhat diminished. Meanwhile the rallying cry for film preservation (the real intent behind Decasia) has been done. The temptation for Tributes - Pulse, with its look back on the twentieth century and homage to those four composers, is to view the damaged materials as the ultimate cinematic signifier of the past. The familiar devices of black and white or silent film are no longer enough, it would appear; now these historical images must be adorned and obscured by decomposition and mould so as to fully encapsulate their status as moments lost in time. Indeed, they would be on the verge of disappearing forever had Morrison not ‘preserved’ them for this particular work. Quite literally, they have become snatched glimpses.
In this respect it makes perfect sense that the imagery behind the deterioration should make itself known only gradually. It’s as though these pictures of the twentieth century could only come to life once we understood that which was taking place, hence the slow burn opening. And so, as Tributes - Pulse progresses, familiar aspects of American life come into view. Initially we are faced with ‘the land’: buffalos and cowboys sneaking in an appearance through chopped up (presumably documentary) footage. This frontier gives way to the industrial age as oil wells put in an appearance, as do paddle steamers and ocean liners, zeppelins and aeroplanes. The simple elements of livestock and landscape are replaced with neon and mechanical activity. In the meantime the cowboys are redressed as men preparing for war. And so it goes on: a trip through the progress and history that was a single century populated solely by forgotten ghosts. In conjunction Morrison inserts footage of growth so as to further this idea of a straightforward progression: the beginning of the second movement is heralded with footage of a crying baby; subsequently we move through young adulthood to eventual old age. On top of this we also hear the influences of the quartet of composers, their work having spanned the entire twentieth century (Ives’ Symphony No. 2 was composed right on the turn of the century; Reich and Reznor continue working to this day) and thus similarly provide Morrison with a very specific framework.
Yet specificity is perhaps too much of an ask for a 65-minute work intended to act as “a requiem” for those one hundred years. The subject matter is too wide-ranging and has too much potential to ever receive full justice under these circumstances. Indeed, by using only decaying nitrate film stock - and, moreover, only decaying nitrate film stock that was due for disposal by the Library of Congress - Morrison could never have hoped of encapsulating an entire century. Surely his choices were dependant wholly on what kinds of footage that stock contained. And just as significant is the fact that this footage would not have encompassed every decade but is rather cut short near the midway point. The auto-combustible nature of nitrate effectively killed it off as the main source for film production by the mid-fifties, whilst the lack of any colour footage in Tributes - Pulse similarly confirms suspicions that only the first half of the century plays a part in the film.
Nevertheless Morrison is still able to pepper his brief running time with some remarkable images. As with Decasia it is the unintentional interaction between the original footage and the damage which proves most startling: tiny planes getting lost in the clouds, except the clouds are actually blotches of mould mere millimetres in length; or the wonderfully serendipitous moment in which the entrance of a cameraman into frame provokes an intense conflagration within the image, only to cease as soon as he exits. Equally wonderful are those times when the splotches of decay appear to pulse in time with the rhythms of Christensen’s accompaniment: a lifeforce from within that momentarily goes against the ghosts onscreen and those undercurrents of death and a forgotten past.
Yet those undercurrents are strong, never more so than in the final passage of Tributes - Pulse, which abandons the dying footage for the newly recorded. As with the opening shots of The Miners' Hymns, wherein the sites of the North East’s are revealed in their present day form (one is a car park, another has become an Asda, etc.), Morrison closes his film colour aerial photography, this time focussing on the Witte Marine Scrapyard in Staten Island. There doesn’t appear to be any direct correlation between this footage and that which has preceded it, though connections between the various liners and steamboats glimpsed earlier and the obsolete vessels captured in the present day are plain to see. The past is past, whether it be the once glorious signifiers of an industrial age or the film stock which captured them - all that remains are crumbling/deteriorating remnants. The juxtaposition is strangely moving and makes for a fitting end. In this respect Morrison’s requiem can count itself a successful one" - Anthony Nield
Razgovor s Morrisonom:
The Cinematic Poetry of Bill Morrison
by Donato Totaro, November 30, 2004
This essay is a response
to having seen a two programme retrospective of Bill Morrison’s work on April
28 and April
29, 2004
at La Cinémathèque Québécoise.
The event was programmed by Offscreen’s French language sister magazine Hors
Champ. Morrison was present on both nights to introduce the films
and respond to audience questions. My thoughts will gravitate toward an impressionist
overview of the series of (mainly) shorts which were projected across the
two evenings. Although I am writing this several months after having seen
the films, I am basing these ideas on scattered notes I took upon viewing
the films and the opportunity I had to view a few other Morriosn short films
which were not part of the programme (City Walk, The East River). Some of my notes were
scribblings uttered by Morrison as a response to his own work, but the strange
thing is that each film left its own indelible image (in some cases just that,
a single image) in my mind, without my always being able to match the image
to a particular film title.
If you have heard of
Bill Morrison it is probably
in relation to his feature film Decasia: The State of Decay (2002),
and his process of taking pre-existing footage from films which have been
largely lost to the natural process of nitrate deterioration, and reconstituting
them as artifacts for a new artistic product. Although it would be unfair
to reduce Morrison’s works to the fallibility of film’s materiality, or ‘ruined’
cinema, several of the most impressive works in the programme do rely heavily
on the materiality of film, and the creative strength to take what would otherwise
be seen as ‘destroyed’ or seriously compromised original footage and bring
them to a new aesthetic existence (a new aesthetic form, rebirthism?). Films
in the program that relied on deteriorated footage were Decasia: The State
of Decay (2002), the only feature length film screened during the programme,
and two shorts which were generated from the same source film, The Bells
(1926, James Young), The Mesmerist (2003) and Light is Calling (2003).
Other Morrison films could be categorized as ‘found footage’ films (The
Film of Her, 1996, Trinity , 2000; and of course the ‘ruined’ films
are also found footage films.) The Film of Her is one of Morrison’s
most outstanding works, a personal, cerebral, yet moving experimental-documentary
about the forgotten legacy of the Library of Congress clerk, Howard L. Walls,
who rediscovered the paper print collection in 1939, which enabled Kemp Niver
to restore them to safety acetate stock in the early 1950s.[1]
Some of the other films are in a more conventional tradition of abstract formalism
(The Night Highway and City Walk, two wonderful companion pieces).
The East River and The Death Train have more in common with
the mytho-poetic films of the 1950’s and 1960s and later American and Canadian
landscape films. While the enchanting ‘neo-Gothic’ noiresque Ghost Trip
is a representational, big screen (cinemascope) experience with characters
and a semblance of a plot.
The opening images of
the programme were appropriate, not only in the chronological sense since
The Night Highway was the earliest film in the programme, but in the
sense of inviting us into Morrison’s ‘trip’: the black and white images begin
with white vertical scratches which give way to manipulated white line fever
shots which arch and curve along with the road (was it actually shot on the
road or wholly optical?). The notion of a ‘trip’ is common across several
of Morrison’s films, including City Walk, The East River, and
Ghost Trip. In City Walk the urban travel imagery is manipulated
to give the impression of a stark, charcoal-like chiaroscuro black and white.
(And in fact, after writing this I noticed in the credits that the film was
an excerpt from The Ridge Theatre staging of a play called “The Carbon Copy
Building.”)
The subject is city movement,
with the camera, situated in a moving vehicle, filming busy urban life (people
on sidewalks, moving vehicles, buildings, and bridges). The texture of the
image at times becomes so porous it recalls Georges Seurat’s pointillism.
The constantly moving imagery, at times blurred, is greatly enhanced by the
music. In fact the function of music in most of Morrison’s work shares equal
importance with the image (if not more). This is something which Morrison
was quick to point out and reiterate several times, reminding us on several
occasions that many of his films were created as part of a multi-media art
project which includes the experimental troupe Ridge Theatre and contemporary
music composer Michael Gordon, whose work is a large factor behind the visceral
impact of Morrison’s films (I’m thinking especially of the throbbing, industrial-symphonic
score to Decasia). In City Walk the music begins with an edgy
guitar, and then layered with a tinkling, minimalist piano and female voicing.
As the film progresses the music becomes ‘thicker,’ more complex, with throbbing,
low end piano chording and recurring percussive guitar stabbings. This precise,
staccato rhythm forms a contrast to the blurring imagery.
The notion of a trip
appears in The East River (2003, 5 minutes), which makes for a different
experience from any of the other Morrison films I’ve seen. The ‘trip’ is of
a more conventional subjective nature, with the (video) camera (and sound)
bringing the viewer into an unseen character’s physical experience of swimming.
As the film begins -this time the film makes aesthetic use of color- we see
water droplets on the camera lens. The camera tracks along with a pair of
feet walking along the banks of the East
River.
The sound of footsteps are prominent as the camera tracks past a mesh fence,
panning past the concrete embankment largely submerged under water, catching
a brief glimpse of a person’s shadow on the concrete wall and a bridge in
the background (recalling if only for these scattered elements, Peter Rose’s
The Man Who Could Not See Far Enough [1982]). We hear the sound of
a loud splash –the character has jumped into the river- with the camera following.
For the remaining few minutes of the film the camera tilts, pans, and moves
(hand-held I would think) its position and level in relation to the water
between complete submersion, water level, and above water. In this section
of the film the camera explores gorgeous underwater color effect patterns
affected by the refracted sunlight.
There
is one wonderful fleeting moment of happenstance which verifies the ontological
truth of what we are seeing: in one of the camera’s underwater moments
a large ant or insect floats past the left side of the camera lens.
The
movement of the camera is also, throughout the film, slowed down to register
a stuttered physical sensation. The film ends when the camera emerges
out of the water at roughly the point of entry, bringing an end to the
‘trip.’
Although different from
his other films, East
River
is
not without precedence. If not a sheer coincidence (since I have not had
this confirmed by Morrison), I would say that the film is strongly influenced
by two similarly themed Barbara Hammer films, Pools (1981, co-directed
by Barbara Klutinis) and Pond and Waterfall (1982). Pools is
an exploration of the architecture in and around two of the twenty pools
designed for Heart Castle in San Simeon by Julia
Morgan, the first female American architect. A stronger influence seems
to be Pond and Waterfall which is a slow motion exploration of
the underwater vegetation and the shimmering effects of refracted sunlight
off/under the water. Like East River, Hammer’s camera appropriates the subjective
position of a person moving through water.
The notion of a trip,
or a limbo state, is given a more dramatic/narrative shape in Morrison’s only
fully representational film, Ghost Trip (2000), which uses a high contrast
black and white stock with an extreme wide angle lens, slow motion cinematography,
and image looping, to render the sense of a slow descent into another dimension.
The film opens with a low angle shot of an old black man in a cemetery singing
an ode to someone who comes back from the dead (“the man has arose…”), while
planting a variety of flowers and vegetation. The film follows a hearse driver
as he picks up a corpse in New Orleans and ends up back at the same cemetery
(circular structure). Morrison referred to this film as reflecting an “existential
limbo,” which can apply to many of his works, including The Death Train
(1993).
The Death Train recalls the work of
Al Razutis in its interest in film history, and Bruce Baillie, with its dreamy
superimpositions and slow lap dissolves and transitions between aerial shots
of a nightscape and phantom rider shots moving in and out of a tunnel (in
particular, Baillie’s Castro Street and The Mass of the Dakota Sioux).
The Death Train concludes with a rhythmically hypnotic montage of an
optically manipulated mushroom cloud which pulsates and throbs in unison with
the sound effects. The sense of an apocalypse returns at the end of Trinity
(2000), which is, as much as anything, Morrison’s Man With a Movie
Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1928), with its play between fiction/non-fiction,
recurring use of graphic formations (roundness being the dominant) and industrial
technologies (trains, automobiles, gear-driven industrial machines). The film
is divided into three sections: 1) Memory 2) Sin 3) Desire. The central recurring
image is found footage from a soft-core porn film of a woman who undresses
(in section one), masturbates while reading a book (in section two), and lies
nude in a seductive supine position, as if awaiting her lover (in section
three). (I think it is the same woman in all three cases, though can’t be
certain.) Joining these erotically charged images are industrial/machinic
imagery (a movie projector, editing table, and factory machines). In Vertov’s
film the utopian vision of human eye and camera eye was an artistic argument
for a new perceptual process to take hold in the post-Revolution Soviet society.
By contrast, Morrison’s fusion of human and machine is purely sensual and
sexual. The sound is important throughout to this meaning, most tellingly
during a key moment in this human-machine sexual symbiosis. The moment begins
with a long shot of a woman masturbating while reading a book. The sound is
a low vibrating hum, accompanied by a (Lynchian) scratched record and a high
pitched electronic whir (the hiss and pops of the revolving record forming
an aural equivalent to the imperfections coating the image track –scratches,
dirt, hair, and grime). The image cuts to an extreme close-up of what looks
like the woman’s hand, moving rhythmically. The music now assumes an electronic
crescendo of machinic sounds, music, and a squeal, culminating in a musical-aural
‘climax.’
I would like to conclude
with a discussion of Morrison’s ‘rebirthism’ or ‘ruined’ cinema entries. As
noted, two of the films draw from different elements of the same ‘deteriorated’
film, The Bells, The Mesmerist and The Light is Calling.
Both films have sections where the condition of celluloid deterioration is
such that the original image is barely recognizable. Of the two the latter
contains more of these moments, while The Mesmerist relies more on
the original’s narrative and representational qualities. That being said the
celluloid ‘state of decay’ impacts greatly on the overall sensorial experience
of both films. The ‘narrative’ of The Mesmerist deals with an amusement
park Caligari-like mesmerist, played by a young Boris Karloff, who has the
power to hypnotize people and make them reveal things about their past. In
the crowd is Lionel Barrymore, who we later learn is a hotel proprietor with
a dark cloud in his past. The condition of these opening crowd scenes are
poor, greatly affected by deterioration, but casts an unusual ‘otherworldly’
quality to the otherwise benign scene. The image is further estranged by two
not entirely complementary visual effects: slow motion (achieved by printing
the original frame three or four times) and the strange impression created
by the deterioration which makes the image seem like it is pulsating, breathing,
bending, and weaving.
The mesmerist dares someone
to join him on stage, and eventually the Barrymore character is on stage.
The mesmerist hypnotizes the Barrymore character, who then recounts, in flashback,
an incident from his past where he meets a Polish Jew at his hotel who is
travelling with a belt full of gold. In terrible debt, the Barrymore character
follows the rich traveller out into the night and murders him for the gold
(the murder is suggested by drops of blood spilling onto clean snow). What
is striking is how well preserved these ‘flashback’ scenes are in comparison
to the other scenes. The effect, intentional or not, is that the material
condition of the film becomes a structural component: distorted and ruined
for the ‘present’ scenes and well preserved and clean for the ‘flashback’
scenes. This structure brings the original film, The Bells, even closer
structurally and aesthetically to the film it obviously draws
from, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919, Robert Weine), which contains
a similar structure of fantasy/reality which is treated different aesthetically.
In The Light is Calling
all that we can make out from the extreme deterioration are shots of officers
on horseback riding through the woods, and a young woman with long braids
who is found and aided by the officers at the end of the film. An interesting
observation I had while watching the three ‘deteriorated’ films is that no
matter how great or advanced the distortion and deterioration, there is one
inevitable constant: the distortion is always in the foreground of
the image. This leads to an equally interesting ‘formal’ and stylistic quality,
because regardless of how flat the original footage may have been, the distortion
introduces an element of ‘depth’ and ‘texture’ to the frame. This is especially
noticeable in The Light is Calling, where the characters (the horseback
officers and the woman) always appear to be ‘behind’ something. For example,
in one scene we see the woman in long shot and, because of the formation of
the deterioration, she appears to be peering through what looks like a fire
or a cloud formation.
The
greatly deteriorated passages where the film stock seems cindered and scorched,
at times appearing like a moving Rorschach chart or Mandelbrot set, recalls
Stan Brakhage’s hand painted films as well as his theory of “closed eye” vision.
The visceral nature of the imagery also reminded me of a live performance
piece by two German multi-media artists (Alchemie) during the 1997 FCMM, where
they literally poured chemicals and compounds onto a film loop before it passed
by the projector lens, throwing an unpredictable and volatile series of light
and color patterns onto a wall, and culminating with the projector catching
fire.
The extremely different
music which accompanies these two films is representative of both the aesthetic
range and importance of music in Morrison’s films. For The Mesmerist Morrison
uses two existing Bill Frisell songs (“Tell you ma, tell your
pa” and “Again”); and for The Light is Calling he uses a composition
written exclusively for the film by Michael Gordon. What these two choices
broadly represent are scores which have an organic relationship to
the image track (The Light is Calling, Trinity, Ghost Trip,
City Walk) and scores which interact with or against the image
track (The Mesmerist, The Film of Her, with Decasia operating
on both levels). Bill Frisell is a contemporary
guitarist-composer who is no stranger to film music, having written several
interpretative scores for Buster Keaton films. His musical style is an intellectual
blend of jazz, blues, folk, country, and rockabilly, a postmodern eclecticism
which, on the one hand, can be seen as a parallel to Morrison’s own re-appropriation
of film history. But the clearly modern, contemporary feel of his music makes
it feel as if it is playing to the film rather than alongside
the film, and emanating from without the film rather than within
the film. On the other hand, the pitch and rhythm of Gordon’s haunting
combination of an undulating electronic loop and high pitched violin is a
perfect harmony to the The Light is Calling’s overall sense of a
spiritual or transcendental rise.
At 67 minutes Decasia
is Morrison’s found footage/’ruined’ cinema magnus opus. And while barely
feature length, the overall experience is of such great intensity –with Michael
Gordon’s incredibly loud, throbbing symphonic soundtrack threatening to melt
the imagery- that one loses the sense of any objective time. As the film’s
credits begin we hear what sounds like whirring Steenbeck plates. The film
moves from a shot of a dervish dancer to a film lab, reflexively suggesting
the birth and creation of the ‘film within a film.’ The film’s circular structure
begins and ends on the same image of a dancing dervish, which links up the
many recurring motifs of birth, death, and the apocalypse. In between there
are images that range from ominous beauty (falling bomb-like parachutes) to
painterly beauty (panoramic silhouette long shots of men on camels walking
across a desert landscape).
Like The Mesmerist
and The Light is Calling, there are some stunningly beautiful deteriorating
images in Decasia: frames that pulsate, burn, and blur, like ‘moving
visual poetry.’ Some of the ‘natural’ distortion and deterioration in Decasia
(and the other films) was so aesthetically entrancing that I was very surprised
to hear Morrison say that the original film footage was not doctored at all,
other than being rephotographed or slowed down. If so, this is quite an aesthetic
statement on the importance of time as a creative act. There is no better
response to Henri Bergson’s ‘cinematographical mechanism,’ which sees time
as a mechanistic and predetermined element. In response to this, time in Decasia
is not arbitrary, but essential. The result is a different conception
of cinematic time, not structural but ontological (and geological). This consideration
of deterioration as a vital aesthetic quality is more attuned to Eastern culture,
India for example, where buildings, places of worship, or monuments are allowed
to crumble, as opposed to the West, which is fixated on making things anew
and dedicated to preservation and restoration (a fear of loss of memory?).
If Decasia works as a total experience, one can not separate its components
from the many layers of ‘time’ which are a necessary condition of its ‘Being.’ Around the Films of Bill Morrison André Habib November 30, 2004
|
Morrisonova web stranica
Articles and Reviews
A Poetic Archaeology of Cinema: The Films of Bill Morrison
First in Morrison’s work, there is history as we know it: capturing events from the past to which we no longer have firsthand access, trying to understand previous ways of life by deciphering the traces left behind. The advent of the film camera in the late 19th century revolutionized our conception of the past, as visual indexes of a particular time period could reveal a multitude of minute traces all at once, giving an impression of, say, a Parisian street or American circus in the late 1890s that no textual description could match. The very first films ever screened continue to provide such remarkable historical snapshots: the Lumière Brothers’ films of workers leaving Parisian factories, for example, offer a keyhole viewpoint of a world that now seems totally alien to us.
Some of Bill Morrison’s “documentaries,” if his work can indeed be described with this label, offer similar historical knowledge. The Film of Her (1996), though partially a fact-fiction hybrid that imbues the act of film preservation with a sense of forbidden love, also offers a fascinating account of the Library of Congress’s Paper Print Collection (in the early years of cinema, filmmakers copyrighted their work by inscribing it onto paper, concluding that movies could be considered creative property if they were tactile like books). Release (2007) details the transfer of Al Capone from Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary to Chicago in 1930 through a single panning shot, combining historical documentation with abstract formal play. Morrison’s later films The Miners’ Hymns (2010) and The Great Flood (2012) offer similarly illuminating footage of coal mining in the northeast region of Durham, England, and the devastating 1927 Mississippi River flood, respectively. These films follow a methodology similar to such anthological documentaries as Chris Marker’s Grin without a Cat (1977) and Thomas Heise’s Material (2009): eschewing overt explication, they offer visual access to the rampaging torrent of history, simply bearing witness to the zeitgeist and hoping we’ll be able to decode the evidence.
Yet the passing of time also takes on a more cosmological scope in Morrison’s films: often deploying severely decayed nitrate film (which, though lethally flammable, provided the film industry with its sparkling images until a new safety acetate film was introduced in 1948), his work makes us aware of the irreversibility of time—the existential fact that everything, whether living, chemical, or plastic, dies and decays. True, films have sometimes been seen as vanquishing time, as immortalizing images (and human figures) in some kind of eternal youth. This is why André Bazin, in “The Ontology of the Photographic Image”, wrote that cinema could finally achieve the ancient Egyptians’ goal of embalming and mummifying the dead. Yet, in such Morrison films as Decasia (2002), Light is Calling (2004, which screened at the Walker that same year), and Just Ancient Loops (2012), witnessing human figures recorded about a century ago smothered by the bubbling, oozing splotches that nitrate film decays into is to realize that time, in spite of what Bazin claimed, eventually triumphs over cinema.
The duality of time as both historical subject and existential force in Morrison’s films also provides the fulcrum for the filmmaker’s documentary and experimental tendencies. The sort of director who is not easily categorized, he is as interested in heightening his audience’s sensorial perception as he is in explicating historical time periods. These dual interests are not dichotomous; they are, instead, flipsides of the same historical coin, a way of perceiving the march of time as both dependent upon humanity and an autonomous force of nature. As the website for Morrison’s Hypnotic Pictures asserts, “His work often makes use of rare archival footage in which forgotten film imagery is reframed as part of our collective mythology.” This mythological aspect is bolstered by the fact that these historical images take on a perverse beauty that can only be wrought by the decay of celluloid.
His work as an experimental filmmaker began in the early 1990s, when he started making semi-abstract films to be incorporated into multimedia performances for New York’s Ridge Theater. Inspired by the avant-garde animator Robert Breer (who taught Morrison at Cooper Union), Morrison began experimenting with the interplay between still and moving images, using innovative processing techniques in doing so. He shot motion-picture film, printed photographs from the 16mm negatives, and developed the images using a paintbrush rather than chemical baths, giving each still image a unique, painterly look.
Morrison’s early interest in film’s simultaneous existence as a recorded image and a material entity would later form the crux of his found-footage work, as it is the deterioration of the material itself that enables such hauntingly surreal imagery. For example, Decasia: The State of Decay (2002)—his most well-known film (and the one that Errol Morris claimed is possibly the greatest movie ever made)—relies upon an optical printer to reshoot severely damaged nitrate film onto a separate print, transferring each single frame numerous times in order to prolong the movement into trippy semi-slow-motion. The imagery and its material basis are inseparable in Decasia.
Another American avant-garde filmmaker inspired the segue between Morrison’s early work and his found-footage experiments. Ken Jacobs’ landmark 1969 film Tom, Tom, the Piper’s Son utilized archival footage from the Library of Congress’s Paper Print Collection, inspiring Morrison to begin purchasing his own prints from the collection and incorporating them into his filmmaking as early as 1992 (with the short Footprints). Four years later, Morrison made a somewhat more overt documentary about this archival collection, The Film of Her—though in the manner of the best experimental filmmakers, even this edifying “documentary” is shrouded in mystery and obfuscation. Besides Jacobs, Morrison has a fertile lineage of found-footage filmmaking to draw from—beginning, arguably, with Joseph Cornell in the 1940s and Bruce Conner in the 1950s, long before found-footage pastiches became a postmodern pastime for YouTube browsers—yet Morrison often seems to approach this archival imagery with a more philosophical bent, questioning the existence of media imagery as living beings as well as formal compositions.
From the start, Morrison approached the historical nature of this footage in a metaphysical way, perceiving the evolution of film itself as a kind of cosmological history in miniature. Because the Library of Congress’s collection is comprised of films from the earliest years of cinema (1896 to 1912), he surmised that it “referenced a very important ‘Beginning’—the beginning of cinema, and infancy in images. Using primitive film I could talk about early man, or childhood, or the evolution of the species.” Even The Film of Her begins with found footage of cells splitting and bubbling primordial oozes, as though the Paper Print Collection provides the origins of the universe itself.
While screening The Film of Her at the first Orphaned Film Symposium at the University of South Carolina in 1999, Morrison—having already received a commission to create an avant-garde film to be screened live alongside Michael Gordon’s newest symphony—checked out the Fox Movietone archive, much of which was in an advanced period of decay. Images of boxers sparring with vertical smears of bleeding chemicals or stern nuns emerging from a hazy fog of photosensitive blotches ultimately led the filmmaker to pitch a film-symphony about “decay” to Gordon, resulting in the overwhelming sensory experience that is Decasia. Accompanied by a blistering wall of sound, the images which Morrison recycles are swirling cyclones of light and shape, both gorgeous and melancholy. This original footage is beyond restoration and, had it not been duplicated in Decasia, would not have survived much longer. The extinction of these images is immanent, but perched as they are at the brink of death, they attain an unsettling beauty. To a great extent the images depend on serendipity, as the visual decay is positioned with uncanny precision to cloak or interact with onscreen figures. The act of decomposition is thus a guiding auteur in Decasia, similar to the way in which sheer chance is a compositional principle in such innovative works as Michael Snow’s La région central (1971), in which the camera is affixed to a large gyroscope, or Lars von Trier’s The Boss of It All (2006), in which an entirely automated camera relies upon computerized algorithms to create visual compositions.
Decasia has been described as an impassioned plea for film restoration and preservation, and there’s no doubt that the decay of the nitrate images on display contributes to a bleak sense of hopelessness. Yet celluloid is not the only thing deteriorating here: the images themselves are comprised of humans, animals, machines, the natural world—all of which are in a constant state of flux (with evisceration its inevitable endpoint). Decasia may be nihilistic, but its central theme—that time cannot be conquered, that all things are in a constant process of reverting to entropic origins—also yields a specific beauty. In the words of film critic André Habib, “The disappearance of film, not by technical obsolescence, but by an organic-chemical law, is as inevitable as the erosion of stones or the aging of bodies. You can slow it down, but you cannot prevent it.”
It’s not all death and dismay in Morrison’s films, though, as suggested by the remarkable short Light Is Calling. Utilizing severely damaged images from the 1927 Lionel Barrymore vehicle The Bells (also the source for Morrison’s 2003 film The Mesmerist), he concocts a dramatic rendezvous between a soldier and his star-crossed lover. Set to Gordon’s surprisingly tender score (practically the polar opposite of his music for Decasia), the two lovers emerge from foreboding swirls of nitrate decay, finally reuniting in a story of film characters conquering the material detritus that threatens to engulf them. If Decasia had a happy ending, it might have been this.
As the optical printing in Decasia slows the process of decay into a hypnotic languidness, Gordon’s shrieking score of bells and brass sounds an overpowering death knell. In fact, many of Morrison’s films began life as collaborations with renowned composers and musicians: Gordon also scored Light of Being (2004) and Who by Water (2007); Bill Frisell provided the music for The Mesmerist (2003) and The Great Flood (2012); Vijay Iyer composed the soundtrack for Release (2010), Icelandic composer Jóhann Jóhansson for The Miners’ Hymns (2010), Michael Harrison for Just Ancient Loops (2012), and Simon Christensen for Tributes: Pulse (2011), which was originally conceived as a tribute to four American musicians (Charles Ives, Conlon Nancarrow, Steve Reich, and Trent Reznor). In other words, despite their near-total absence of dialogue, spoken narration, and sound effects, it’s absurd to think of Morrison’s films as silent: the musical scores are central to their unsettling power, as the New Yorker recognizes when it notes one sequence in Decasia in which four trombones simultaneously blare an E-flat minor—“the unofficial key of death.”
Another powerful example of the centrality of music is The Great Flood, Morrison’s documentary of the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927. The most devastating river flood in US history, the Great Mississippi Flood broke its levees in 145 places and engulfed 27,000 square miles. It also contributed to the Great Migration of tens of thousands of black southerners to the northern states—especially to Chicago, where southern blues music became electrified and transformed into a distinctively gritty Chicago blues style and indirectly led to the rise of rock and roll. Ironically, then, despite the calamitous devastation on display in The Great Flood, it ends up being one of Morrison’s most hopeful films: the final two sequences of the movie (entitled “Migration” and “Watershed”) herald the development of a new musical art form, positing creativity as a powerful weapon to counteract tragedy and death. Whereas the power of art has little place in Decasia, it is the ultimately optimistic centerpiece of The Great Flood, which closes with a beautifully understated shot of a southern émigré wielding his electric guitar.
The Great Flood also offers uncommonly intimate visual access to a huge cast of (unknown) characters circa 1927: simply by peering into the faces of African American sharecroppers or a jovial upper-class family awaiting rescue, we might almost get a sense of the human drama that transpired when the levees broke. Morrison is often described as an abstract experimenter, but the lingering attention he pays to striking human faces also points towards his humanism: we can never forget that real people took part in these historical dramas.
The nameless characters we follow in The Miners’ Hymns are conveyed with similar respect and sensitivity. A visual document of the coal mines in Durham throughout the early 20th century, the film draws almost exclusively from archival footage originally produced by the National Coal Board’s Film Unit. What you notice immediately is the incredibly high standard to which their cinematographers held themselves: flawlessly lit, in gorgeous high contrast, these images of churning Moloch-like machinery and weary-eyed miners toiling in the wee hours of the morning are breathtakingly beautiful. Such footage allows us to become immersed in a world we would otherwise hardly know: shots of toddlers and a puppy running blissfully down a mountain of coal seem to belong to a hermetically-sealed sliver of time, so alien in look and feel that it seems impossible they took place less than a century ago. Actually, it may not be too surprising that Morrison feels a great affinity for these coal miners: as Manohla Dargis points out in her New York Times review, he is “a miner himself of a type,” excavating the archives for the fertile fragments that might be found within. What’s more, the celluloid film industry is currently facing an extinction to which the British coal mining industry has already succumbed: if the coal mines we see have since been replaced by box stores and soccer stadiums, the films that Morrison appropriates will soon be supplanted by DCP files and digital projectors.
Given the materiality of his images—the fact that they depend upon the decay of the physical strip of film—one might ask how Morrison’s method changes with the digital revolution. After all, Decasia might be about all natural decay rather than the growing obsolescence of celluloid, but over the last decade the transformation of film production and exhibition from celluloid to digital forms has steamrolled ahead, leading some to proclaim that the death of celluloid is at hand. Obviously, the deterioration of film is still the impetus and guiding principle for his work, but he’s also able to incorporate digital technologies into his practice: as he told IndieWire in 2012, “When I started with Decasia…we stayed analogue all the way through. We found film masters, and we printed optically, and I cut it on a Steenbeck…. I wouldn’t wish that on anyone now. But the last films have all been assembled digitally, so in a way that subject matter, and the close physical relationship with film stock, probably isn’t as pronounced now as it was in the earlier work.”
In a way, then, Morrison practices an ideal fusion between analogue and digital technologies, relying upon celluloid as a formal base yet editing (and often projecting) using digital technology. In retrospect, we can more clearly see that Decasia is not so much about the tragic death of celluloid as about the deterioration of all matter, whether living, organic, or manmade. He bemusedly accepts the digital revolution: “Like all of us, I now live in a digital world. So for me to insist everything remain analogue is kind of disingenuous.” As time marches on, media technologies transform along with the world around it. What remains unsaid, however, is that digital files are subject to the same law of decay that plagues all physical matter: they too will become corrupted or eviscerated over time, though the images contained within will presumably not deteriorate with the same morbid beauty as their nitrate brethren.
What distinguishes films such as Decasia and Just Ancient Loops from like-minded works—aside from their breathtaking, haunting dream imagery—may be Morrison’s metaphysical scope. Through seemingly abstract patterns, he hints at the simultaneous autonomy and flexibility of time: the impossibility of halting or bending it, yet at the same time the ability for images to reappear across history, giving rise to wildly new impressions and contexts. In doing so, he somehow seems to approach the nature of existence (human and otherwise) in a universe perpetually subject to the erosion of time. His films take place in an uncanny gray area between life and death, between survival and decay; on the brink of absence and presence, they remind us that cinematic images always exist in this nebulous zone, constantly in danger of vanishing into nothing at all.
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar